🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial policy to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are observing intently to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of nations are exploring comparable bans.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our kids' childhood". The policy could be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban is "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has asked parliament to pass a law raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged parents to block their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic resolution calling for a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is given. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the step does not establish binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a solid starting point," said one parliamentarian driving the resolution.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "based on conclusive evidence".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a proposal to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the administration committed to investigate the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised warnings. One foundation established by the loved ones of a girl who died after encountering dangerous platform posts suggests that a simple age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build products and services that are appropriate and suitable for minors," stated a influential peer.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

Across America, regulation is primarily occurring at the regional level due to federal inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a rule capping minors to one hour of social media use per day, with additional use requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted laws demanding adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from some individuals to copy the Australian example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of these regions, further states are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, world bodies adopt a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

While this global conversation unfolds, the policies of this nation and its followers demonstrate that states around the world are increasingly prepared to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.